Schools,
Programs, & Visit Reports - Dec, 1992 Issue
|
John Dewey Academy
Dr. Thomas E. Bratter, President
413-528-9800
Great Barrington, Massachusetts
Tom Croke Visit
412-532-0490
My initial impression of John
Dewey Academy was formed about fifteen years ago -- prior to the school's
founding -- when I met Dr. Thomas Edward Bratter, the schools president
and founder. We were at a conference on New Orleans where Tom was presenting
a paper on intervention with substance abusing adolescents.
In that paper, Tom described
the appropriate relationship between a professional intervening with
a substance abusing teenager as a battle which needs to be won by the
professional using almost guerilla tactics. The application of that
belief system, controversial, and something which resembles enmeshed
family dynamics, dominates Tom's work at John Dewey Academy to this
day. It also explains a big part of JDA's success.
A second factor is unique
to JDA and needs to be understood in evaluating the school. Where most
other structured boarding schools are focused on personal growth and/or
therapeutic intervention, John Dewey Academy focuses on the objective
of placing its students in colleges of distinction, and the character
development necessary to that end.
The only thing really important
in selecting and retaining students at John Dewey Academy, besides integrity,
is whether or not they are perceived as potentially successful as college
or university students in schools of distinction, and support JDA's
reputation in the eyes of the colleges as a source of quality admission
candidates. Students perceived to be off track for that goal will probably
not make it to graduation at JDA. A student who graduates from John
Dewey Academy and brings discredit on the credibility of JDA to get
its graduates admitted to colleges of distinction, will feel the impact
of Tom Bratter's principles of the obligation to join the battle. There
is no question that all of this is controversial, and people I highly
respect will not refer to JDA because of Tom's response to students
who break their commitments. Those who understand what is happening
and do not agree with it, are clearly entitled to their view, and can
make a credible case for it. Those who are reluctant because they feel
the school is unpredictable, do not understand the principles which
guide the school. The school is entirely predictable, effective in its
mission and honestly presented.
When I visited JDA, its student
body was the most self regulated group of teenagers I have ever seen.
I arrived at 8:30 P.M., to a group of students essentially running the
school for the evening. One student checked me in. Another drove up
in the school van, having been on a business errand for the school.
With no adult intervention the students were flawless in meeting their
responsibilities to themselves and each other, and putting out a red
carpet for me.
This carries through all aspects
of student life, with admission and hiring decisions subject to student
screening. Students feel empowerment in this environment. This may be
easier to achieve at JDA than at other schools, because JDA only accepts
students who want to remain by the time they complete the probationary
visit which is a required part of the application procedure.
One other unusual feature,
was the number of students who had previously been inpatients in psychiatric
hospitals on heavy medications for alleged thought disorders. They certainly
weren't thought disordered the day I was there, and they certainly were
not being medicated.
The classes I attended were
conducted with excellence matching the finest independent preparatory
schools. Every student was focused on the twin goals of college admission
and responsible living. When I attended group, it seemed more connected
with life outside group than comparable groups in comparable schools.
The day I was there Tom led group, as his bsent, and I lacked the opportunity
to experience others balancing his energy. Tom was omnipresent, confrontational,
and functioning as a hard to please parent.
A referral to John Dewey Academy
is a high risk, high gain affair. What a student can gain is a foundation
for a successful future after a troubled history may exceed the potential
of any other structured boarding school. Virtually all of their students
are placed in competitive four year colleges, and close to half are
dean's list students. What a student risks is the potential not to make
it through a program which requires constant attention to the mission
on which their acceptance to the school was based. But nothing is hidden
and what you see is what you get.
I would refer the right student
to JDA, and have made several unsuccessful attempts at referral since
my visit. I would also keep close tabs on his/her progress, once admitted.
I would not refer a student I thought would be damaged by not making
it through their system. I would also use a referral as an excuse to
stop by frequently. A visit to JDA is something I truly enjoy.
Copyright
© 1992, Woodbury Reports, Inc. (This article may be reproduced without
prior approval if the copyright notice and proper publication and author
attribution accompanies the copy.) |